The 206-member Transparency Group in the House of Representatives has
told Speaker Yakubu Dogara to resign honourably over his alleged
involvement in budget padding or be forced out. The group also alleged
that Dogara diverted 50 per cent of the total capital projects allocated
to Bauchi State to his constituency.”
It insisted that Dogara must step aside for independent investigation
to be carried out in the allegations of budget padding against him or
be forced out of office. Dogara had, on Friday, dismissed calls for his
resignation after a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari at the State
House, saying there was nothing like padding in the legislature.
In a statement jointly signed on behalf of the Transparency Group by
Hon. Bashir Baballe, member representing Ungogo/ Minjibir Federal
Constituency of Kano State; Hon. Agunsoye Oluwarotimi Ojo, member
representing Kosofe Federal Constituency of Lagos State; and Hon.
Abubakar Chika Adamu, member representing Shiroro/Munya/Rafi Federal
Constituency of Niger State, the group asked the speaker to resign
honourably.
“We hereby reiterate our call on Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara to resign
before we start exposing the sleaze and corruption surrounding the
internal budget of the House,” the group stated.
The three lawmakers said they released the statement “on behalf of
the 206 members of Transparency Group,” although names of the other 203
members of the group were not disclosed.
According to the lawmakers, Dogara should immediately step down for
proper investigation or new allegations would be unearthed to ultimately
force his hands. Also yesterday, leader of the Transparency Group, Hon.
Mohammed Musa Soba (APC, Kaduna), in an interview with New Telegraph,
accused Dogara of fraudulently earmarking more than N3 billion for
projects sited in his constituency, an action he said bordered on
criminality.
“The general public should note that Speaker Dogara made criminal
insertions (otherwise known as budget padding) to the tune of over N3
billion to his constituency alone.
“While the entire zonal intervention for the three senatorial
districts of Bauchi State and 12 federal constituencies in the state
amounts to N1,666,666,666, the Speaker criminally inserted about 200 per
cent of the amount, totalling N3,079,000,000 to his constituency
alone,” the group said.
It further alleged that Dogara “diverted 50 per cent of the total
capital projects allocated to Bauchi State to the tune of N4,781,003,431
out of N9,231,289,842 allocated to the state to his constituency.”
It equally alleged that N950 million purportedly meant for
empowerment schemes was also diverted by the speaker. It is, however,
contradictory that while the Transparency Group claims to have 206
signatures, the speaker has reportedly garnered 262 signatures bringing
the total to 468, whereas the House is composed of 360 members only.
But, Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs,
Hon. Abdulrazaq Namdas, in an interview with New Telegraph yesterday in
Abuja, said “nobody can force Dogara out of office.”
Namdas hinged his position on the fact that the allegations against
Dogara have not been proven before any competent court of law. He also
dismissed the 206 lawmakers purported to be members of the Transparency
Group calling on Dogara to resign, daring them to remove the speaker if
they have the numbers.
Dismissing the 206 signatures allegedly garnered by Transparency
Group to impeach Dogara should he refuse to resign, Namdas said: “I
believe that even the numbers of lawmakers’ signatures they are alleging
that they have generated are not there.
I’m sure they don’t even have the numbers. “Thirdly, if people are
talking about transparency and have forgotten that part of transparency
is the doctrine of fair hearing, then it is unfortunate.
Transparency also means allowing the other party fair hearing to make
his defence. So, if someone has submitted a petition, it is only
natural that the person being accused be allowed to also present his own
side of the story.
“The good thing about these allegations is that they have been
forwarded to the anti-corruption agencies and, therefore, they should
allow the agencies to approach the speaker to state his defence instead
of asking him to resign.”
Meanwhile, barely four days after the All Progressives Congress (APC)
asked him to cease fire, former chairman of the Appropriation
Committee,Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin, yesterday broke his silence, insisting
that the Speaker must reconvene the House immediately.
In a statement issued last night in Abuja, Jibrin alleged that there
was plan to kill him and that he has since briefed his lawyers on the
matter. “I no longer feel safe. I have carefully followed their
desperation to suppress what will go down in history as the biggest
corruption case in Nigeria. I have prepared myself for any eventuality. I
have spoken to my mum and dad extensively during the weekend. “I have
prepared my family.
I have handed over a handwritten note and documents to a popular SAN,
a man of integrity and other persons that I believe will lay it bare
even if they succeed in killing me,” he said.
He added that the accused “have resorted to using every tactic to
narrow the allegations to only issue of padding, which in itself is a
grievous offense, ignoring tens of other criminal allegations contained
in my petition to the anti-corruption agencies.”
“In doing so, they mischievously expanded the scope of the
culpability to give an impression that the entire House, Senate and even
the executive arm of government and some individuals outside NASSare on
trial,” he noted.
He pleaded with all former Heads of State and the diplomatic
community, particularly Ambassador of the United States of America, High
Commissioner of the United Kingdom, the German and French Ambassadors
to call on Dogara to step aside to allow a thorough external
investigation.
Also, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP)
has disagreed with Dogara’s declaration that “budget padding is not a
crime under Nigerian law.”
In a statement issued yesterday by its executive director, Adetokunbo
Mumuni, SERAP insisted that: “Budget padding in fact is corruption, as
it is implicit in corruption offences such as abuse of office, attempt
to embezzle, divert and misappropriate public funds, conspiracy to act
corruptly, and illicit enrichment, which are recognised under the UN
Convention against Corruption.
“A prima-facie case of corruption is established when elected
officials are allegedly influenced to act contrary to their obligations
of office by the prospect of financial gain to themselves. Budget
padding also amounts to corruption as the action is against the public
interest.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment